Technical Clarification
Compliance Paths (ENE & WAT) for Recertification of PILOT projects to V1
Erratum Number
GEN-1-T-EBP1-1353
Guidance
2016-03-16
Energy and Water Compliance Paths used by EBP PILOT Projects in the first submission are able to use the same Compliance Path for their first V1 submission only.
The GBCSA confirms that for recertification or any future certification of the same building that the Compliance Path route set out in the latest Technical Manual will need to be followed.
The GBCSA recognises that projects that go straight to V1 and therefore don’t have historical data have an advantage over projects that are ‘already on the journey’ is a reality and not one that the Tool addresses.
PILOT Project Teams using the same Compliance Path for their first V1 submission are to submit a CIR via Zendesk with their motivation, clearly explaining why the other Compliance Paths may disadvantage the project.
Erratum
Policy and Plan/ Programme Model
Erratum Number
GEN-1-E-EBP1-1139
Guidance
2015-11-16
This Policy/Programme Model sets out the framework which Policies, Programmes & Plans are to follow for Green Star SA - Existing Building Performance Certification. See the specific credits in the Technical Manual for further details.
Scroll to the bottom to see attached PDF document.
Technical Clarification
Performance Period for the credits
Erratum Number
GEN-1-T-EBP1-1170
Guidance
2015-11-16
The performance period guidelines for EBP v1.
Scroll to the bottom to see attached PDF document
Technical Clarification
As Built drawings
TC Number
GEN-1-T-EBP1-1189
Guidance
2015-11-25
Only As Built drawings will be accepted for the Existing Building Performance rating tool.
Comments